The Brain that Meets the Universe
"Complementarity is an invitation to consider different perspectives. Unfamiliar questions, unfamiliar facts, or unfamiliar attitudes, in the spirit of complementarity, give us opportunities to try out new points of view and to learn from what they reveal. They foster mind expansion.
Why not bring this spirit to supposed conflicts between art and science, or philosophy and science, or religion A and religion B, or religion and science?
It can be illuminating to look at the world in different ways."
- Frank Wilczek
Science has done an incredibly good job of explaining the world we live in. Many questions have been examined through this lens, which has proven to be powerful enough to convincingly shed light on subjects which seemed out of its reach, or simply too complex. Armed with the technology that science has helped us to develop we aim our powers of scientific methodology at mysteries of all sorts, including many which were formerly reserved for metaphysics, religion, and science fiction. But humans still have some fascinating, fundamental, unanswered questions which science struggles with. Consciousness, the nature of reality, the fine-tuning conundrum, self-organization of life, interpreting quantum uncertainty, to name a few, are areas where science is at least partially speculative in its explanations. These are areas to be looked at from many angles, considering the views of the best ideas from any discipline. This is the place to bring bold thinking and healthy skepticism. This is where The Brain that Meets the Universe lives.
So, who is the blogger here? And how did this odd website come about? Here's the story:
Like so many others, my usual activities were interrupted due to the Covid pandemic beginning at the end of March, 2020, when Mexico City, where I live, began to lock down. Having suddenly time on my hands, I finished Brian Greene's latest book, "Until the End of Time" and found that there was one explanation there which seemed not wrong but, in my view, flawed: his take on why free will is not really free. There is, it turns out, a vast amount written on this subject, but it seemed that a fundamental element of it, namely the concept of non-determinism, could be nicely supported by what chaos theory and particle physics tells us about the limits of predictions. Having a physics background, a neuroscientist sister, a passion for sci-fi and a lot of time turned out to be a good mix for creating, well, this. Hope it gets you questioning as well.
​
Edgar Chicurel